Thursday, April 19, 2012

Economic justification for taxes and some little known facts

1. No matter what the corporate income tax rate, all corporations will contribute net $0 in taxes over their lifetime.
The taxation philosophy of the US and Canada (and I assume everywhere else) allows losses in one year to be applied to profits in preceding or future years, and so allows corporations to receive income tax rebates for those years with losses.  This is philosophically justified in that your taxes over a 5 year period should be the same if your total net profit over the 5 years was the same.

While the tax code does try to prevent the length of time that losses can be allowed to be carried back, and tries to keep some of the income taxes corporation pay through other codes, the fact that tax losses are transferable/sellable to other companies upon bankruptcy, means that, since all corporations eventually go bankrupt, all income taxes paid by them are eventually refunded to some corporation.

2. If all countries have the same corporate tax rate, there will be more investment at a 90% tax rate than at a 0% tax rate,
assuming that tax rebates for losses are quick convenient and accessible.  Under both tax rates, an obviously profitable investment will be undertaken.  It is risky, inherently uncertain investments that will be undertaken at a high tax rate and not at a low tax rate.

Consider an investment opportunity that with 60% chance will double in one year, and a 40% chance will lose all of its value.  The expected return is 20%.  Company A0 lives in a 0% taxation world, and company B90 in a 90% taxed world.  If there is unlimited investment possible, then A0 investing $100K will make or lose as much after tax as B90 if it invested $1M.  If B90 loses $1M, they get a 900K rebate from government.   If they win $1M, they keep 100k after tax.  B90 creates 10x the investment and economic activity that A0 does.

Consider if both companies only have 100K total capital.  A0 would never rationally invest it all on this investment because it faces bankruptcy if it fails.  B90 only risks 10k when investing $100k.  If we add into the world, banks with the same taxation rate as the company,
  • company A0 can only afford to borrow $45K@10% and invest $50K of its own funds if it is forced to be able to repay the bank even if it loses.  If it wins, it earns $90,500, while it loses $99500 the other 40% of the time.  A $14500 expected gain, but still 40% chance of (near) bankruptcy.  
  • B90 can afford to borrow $900K@10% and invest none of its funds.  If it wins, it earns $810K before tax, $81K after tax.  While it loses 990K before tax, 99K after tax the other 40% of the time.  A $9K expected gain.
While the expected gain is a bit better for A0, keep in mind that 9x the economic activity is created by B90,  and the returns from unused funds by both companies were not include.  Also, the bank in both cases has no risk, and makes 20x more money pretax by lending to B90 and 2x more after  tax.  The bank makes as much lending at 5% to B90 as it does at 10% to A0.  In a 90% taxed world, all loans/investments are inherently 10x less risky.

Putting a real world face on the above investment, let's say it involves hiring an engineer or scientist to design something useful for his corporate masters at a $100k annual salary.  40% chance he will come up with nothing, and 60% chance he will come up with something worth on average double his salary.  A0 is risking its entire company by hiring one engineer.  B90 can take advantage of diversification and hire up to 10 engineers for the same after tax cost and risk.  The expectation is that 4 engineers will fail, and 6 engineers will succeed.  Most importantly, the risk that all 10 will fail, and cause bankruptcy, is only 0.01% (bankruptcy defined as losing $100K, since if all engineers fail, B90 would receive $900k tax rebate).  Both A0 and B90 still have the same expected after tax return.  Because of diversification, B90 can still afford to hire extra engineers even if the 9th and 10th engineer only have a 51% chance of success.

The other real world impact of high tax rates on investment is that for B90 all investments and expenses cost 1/10th what they do for A0.  B90 can buy nicer computers, more or nicer company cars, hire someone's idiot nephew, and generally be nice to members of the organization, because being nice costs 1/10th what it does for A0.  A0 has to cut costs to the bone, and invest in only sure things, because it pays full price for everything.

The headline of this section included the assumption of uniform tax rates in all nations.  This requirement is eliminated by natural taxation policies discussed below, but the reason that the assumption is necessary is that if companies A0 and B90 were owned by the same multinational, then through accounting tricks, it would make all of its profits in A0 and all of its losses/expenses in B90.

Taxation is neither waste nor theft
Combining the previous 2 sections, despite the net 0 lifetime taxes paid by corporations, a 90% tax rate will not only provide the same after tax profit to companies, but with a 40% net personal tax, will also generate a social fund of $180k (on $200k pretax profit for B90) + $400K (on personal income taxes paid by engineers).  A total of $580K.  In addition to creating 10 good jobs, that social surplus could be distributed to the population giving them more power to afford B90's products and thus increase its sales and profits.

value and waste
When a billionaire gives $1000 to 1 Million people, value is created for the entire society.  If the society had only 2 buisnesses: food distribution and yacht sales, then because 1M people are able to purchase more food, it will increase sales and profits for the food industy, and thus create more potential customers for the yacht salesman than if he were to only rely on the initial billionaire.  Money is never wasted when it is transferred to someone else.

There are 3 important kinds of waste
  • waste of people's time: When you hire someone to dig a hole and then refill it, you gained no value, and wasted his time.  If you gifted him the money without requiring work, he could have been learning, entertained, or working for someone else for additional money.  Wasting people's time is the least important kind of waste because there is usually slack in the labour force, and the most likely alternative scenario to wasting someone's time is that he would have wasted his own time.  
  • waste of money's time: Any money that is not spent or invested is wasted for the time that it is not.  Savings, though a personal necessity at some level, is a waste if the savings level could be made non-necessary.  Waste of money's time is a very serious waste, because if money is spent and invested more, increasing its velocity, then more people's time can be used in activities that receive that money.
  • waste of resources: Transforming a lump of iron into a car does not waste the iron because the car is generally considered more valuable/useful, and it can always be recycled back into a lump of iron.  Building and rebuilding homes in an area where hurricanes will knock them down regularly is wasteful of building materials and people's time.  Transportation tends to be wasteful of energy, especially non renewable fuels.  War wastes people's time and resources to destroy resources and people.

Value can be defined as creating happiness or things people want, and reducing waste.  The concept of net value and net waste can be comparable to net profit, in that we can hope that any waste incurred in creating value is less than the value created.

Taxes are not waste
While the transfer of money is never waste, some spending can be.  Useless programs waste people's time and war is a larger waste.  But it is the spending and not the taxation that is wasteful.  Since redistribution of wealth towards the poor always creates value by reducing money's waste of time (increases total spending), and any useless programs involved in filtering who is eligible to receive funds can be eliminated, and the funds distributed equally to everyone who asks (or just everyone) instead, there exists at least one use of taxation that cannot be waste, and so any waste on the process is entirely attributable to spending choices.

Income Taxes are not theft
Success can be based on hard work, showing up, and practiced talent, but always involves luck.  Sometimes, luck is the main factor for success.  Health, parents, asset performance, marriage, insurance, timing, and showing up are all luck based factors that will influence success.  Progressive taxation is an entirely fair system to distribute wealth from the lucky to the unlucky.  If society was a gambling game, or like in the corporate taxation example above, every game participant would accept taxation rules without objection. If they wanted to play with more risk, they would simply have to bet more.

One of the most pernicious, but little understood thefts, by society and government is inter-generational theft in terms of  both social debt, and retirement safety nets that exist for the current generation of seniors, but will be taken away from future generations due to crushing past debt, an aging population, and a self-interested voting block naturally more concerned with preserving their own entitlements than caring for the sustainability of civilization after thier deaths.

Despite the existence of social programs that are wasteful or program structures that are thievish, it is the spending that is wasteful or thievish, and not the taxation.  All tax revenue distributed back to the public through spending, will be returned to businesses who will be able to continue supporting existing employees, and hire new ones.  When tax funds are spent right away rather than saved for future retirees, money's time is not wasted, and it is returned more quickly for the benefit of taxpayers and the poor.  Basic income entitlements are thus less wasteful than properly funded retirement entitlement programs.

Sales taxes can be considered theft or wasteful because they are regressive and waste money's time by discouraging spending.

Natural taxation as a basis for cooperation among neighbouring societies
Natural tax policies focus on preventing the waste of money's time, but also solve issues with globalization and  having a prosperous high taxes society along side low taxed societies.  Key features:
  • Taxation based on cashflow: Cash inflows (revenues) are taxed in the jurisdiction they are earned (in importing country).  Cash outflows (expenses) are a tax deduction in the home jurisdiction.
  • Your nation's exporters can receive large tax rebates, while much of your nation's tax collections come from firms you import from.
  • Investment inflows (loans/ share purchases) into a corporation are taxable if not spent by the corporation within a time limit, and result in a tax credit (but not refund) for the investor.  
  • Investment outflows (interest and dividends) are tax deductible by the corporation, and the investor pays a non-refundable 10% tax on such investment income in his home jurisdiction, and pays an income/corporate tax on the remainder in the business's jurisdiction.  Similar tax transactions occur on gains or losses from the investment.
  • Personal income tax deductions include reinvestment of all investment income, and (re)investment of up to 70% of all employment and business income.  Any withdrawals from investment accounts, or loans received, are counted as income.  Allowable investments include providing 0% interest loans to family members or personal service providers, so individuals can shelter and split up to 70% of all employment, business income and investment withdrawals
Natural taxation achieves social goals and several eliminations of wastes
  • The tax deductibility of dividends to businesses likely results in them paying no taxes, and encourages them to pay back their investors.  This reduces the waste of money's time by circulating corporate cash hordes back into the economy.
  • Social tax revenue becomes a combination of 10% of investment income + a progressive consumption tax
  • The ease of income splitting and obtaining personal services in a tax sheltered manner would increase demand for such labour intensive occupations, and so reduce the waste of labour's time, increasing employment, labour force participation, and wages
  • If all people are in an income tax bracket that is lower than the corporate tax rate, or if there is a fixed tax rate on investment income that is lower than the corporate rate, then paying dividends for companies always reduces the overall tax burden to shareholders.  The availability of many high (dividend) yielding investments increases the income stability, and reduces risk, of investment portfolios.  Stability of investment income reduces the waste of money's time because additional savings  (as investment portfolio) are less necessary if existing savings/investments are reliable.
  • Simplifying income splitting leads to more income equality.  The tax deductibility of personal services leads to those services in the official, rather than underground, economy, and result in taxes paid by the personal service providers.
  • Even if there are high marginal tax rates for personal income, natural tax policies don't discourage working "hard" for one year, because of the ease with which to shelter income (through investment deduction) to use in future years.
  • While all corporations that pay no dividends will pay net 0% income taxes in their lifetimes, Natural cashflow taxation allows society to extract non-refundable taxes on dividends and imports.  Though exports are a drain on the tax pool, they are a net cash inflow into the society available to be spent within the society.
Economic justification of taxes without government programs
With the right (natural) taxation rules, a society can promote R&D and other economic activity, and income equality, by encouraging investment and spending.  The alternative of 0% taxation leads to hoarding, expense cutting and risk-aversion to investments, because every cash outflow is fully borne by the payer.  This in turn results in fewer or more difficult sales because your potential customers are hoarding too.

So, even if the only government programs are tax collection/enforcement, and the distribution of tax revenue as a cash social dividend (equal distribution to all citizens), natural taxation creates economic activity and less income disparity independently of the usefulness or wastefulness of any other government function or program.

39 comments:

  1. If you're looking for Natural Taxation, I urge you to read Thomas Shearman's wise book on the topic.

    Natural Public Revenue which doesn't take from anyone that which he created, but captures for public use that which the community creates.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Shearman proposed land tax as a unique social revenue source. His justification for its fairness is good, however, it would be incredibly disruptive.

      For example, if a property tax bill that is currently $2k went up to $10k, you could argue that for homeowners that save $8k in income taxes would not have their home affordability affected, but when you look at it from rental equivalent properties, then either renters would have to be charged significantly more, or property values would have to substantially decrease in order to justify their value to rental income ratios.

      Both options would be too disruptive. The first, essentially makes it a huge "tax"/cost of living increase on renters, the 2nd would destroy wealth and bank loan values, and likely fail to economically justify building costs.

      Delete
  2. Pascal: I suggest you have a gander here:
    http://kaalvtn.blogspot.co.uk/p/index.html

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I wouldn't mind creating a post or elaborating on many of the subjects you write concerning here. Again, awesome web site!

    ReplyDelete
  5. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  6. The theory fails to predict important phenomena such as "strong reciprocity" - the propensity to "irrationally" sacrifice resources to reward forthcoming collaborators and punish free-riders.guarantor loans

    ReplyDelete
  7. Informative blog shared by you about Economic justification for taxes. You can find complete guideline of ATO Tax Payment Plan at taxezi.com.au.

    ReplyDelete
  8. This is my first time i visit here. I found so many entertaining stuff in your blog, especially its discussion. From the tons of comments on your articles, I guess I am not the only one having all the enjoyment here! Keep up the good work.tax preparation services

    ReplyDelete
  9. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hope that you guys keep on doing the great work because we all need mortgage-advice-online.org to run our financial businesses.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Excellent article plus its information and I positively bookmark to this site because here I always get an amazing knowledge as I expect. Thanks for this to share with us 90%+ Accuracy on all VIP trades.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I truly liked these details. For everyone, it is essential to think about future financial goals and should take steps in order to accomplish those goals. Even I just got my 2019 saving and investment plan ready and have chosen options with income tax saving benefits.

    ReplyDelete
  13. You know your projects stand out of the herd. There is something special about them. It seems to me all of them are really brilliant! click here

    ReplyDelete
  14. Great article with excellent idea!Thank you for such a valuable article. I really appreciate for this great information.. Blue chip stocks

    ReplyDelete
  15. A lot of people having an incorrect image about the cash advance loans or sometimes refer it as bad credit payday loans. penny stocks

    ReplyDelete
  16. I want you to thank for your time of this wonderful read!!! I definitely enjoy every little bit of it and I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff of your blog a must read blog Bitcoin Crash Price

    ReplyDelete
  17. Hello Everybody,
    My name is Mrs Sharon Sim. I live in Singapore and i am a happy woman today? and i told my self that any lender that rescue my family from our poor situation, i will refer any person that is looking for loan to him, he gave me happiness to me and my family, i was in need of a loan of $250,000.00 to start my life all over as i am a single mother with 3 kids I met this honest and GOD fearing man loan lender that help me with a loan of $250,000.00 SG. Dollar, he is a GOD fearing man, if you are in need of loan and you will pay back the loan please contact him tell him that is Mrs Sharon, that refer you to him. contact Dr Purva Pius, call/whats-App Contact Number +918929509036 via email:(urgentloan22@gmail.com) Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Thanks so much with this fantastic new web site. very fired up to show it to anyone. It makes me so satisfied your vast understanding and wisdom have a new channel for trying into the world. Tax preparation service

    ReplyDelete
  19. Having your very own items whether it's hard products or computerized merchandise is perhaps the most ideal approaches to profit on the web and typically, you can get more achievement. make money online

    ReplyDelete
  20. I have been absent for some time, but now I remember why I used to love this web site. Thank you, I will try and check back more often. How frequently you update your website?
    managed forex accounts

    ReplyDelete
  21. I have read your excellent post. This is a great job. I have enjoyed reading your post first time. I want to say thanks for this post. Thank you... 微积分辅导

    ReplyDelete
  22. This article gives the light in which we can observe the reality. This is very nice one and gives indepth information. Thanks for this nice article. online tax preparation

    ReplyDelete
  23. I am impressed. I don't think Ive met anyone who knows as much about this subject as you do. You are truly well informed and very intelligent. You wrote something that people could understand and made the subject intriguing for everyone. Really, great blog you have got here. www.taxfyle.com

    ReplyDelete
  24. I was looking at some of your posts on this website and I conceive this web site is really instructive! Keep putting up.. how do i calculate my business taxes

    ReplyDelete
  25. Great write-up, I am a big believer in commenting on blogs to inform the blog writers know that they’ve added something worthwhile to the world wide web!.. taxfyle.com/tax-bracket-calculator

    ReplyDelete
  26. Most people always think that taking a mortgage loan is very tough nowadays. But believe me, it is not. Whereas you can take loans without a mortgage if you don’t have any experienced. The mortgage brokers whitby only can help you in that situation. Because they will manage your loan on an easy process system. And you can repay the loan in the easiest way.

    ReplyDelete
  27. In every spare of our life, we need money to survive. Hence sometimes we need money so badly. That time we try to lend money to others. Sometimes we found, sometimes we were not. In that case, we don't need to go here and there. We can go to the best mortgage rates whitby company. They will provide our desirable loan at easy rates and also on easy conditions.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Yes, great US Military force. Also, in his post you have given a chance to listen about US Military. I really appreciate your work. Thanks for sharing it.
    cool training

    ReplyDelete
  29. it's really nice and meanful. it's really cool blog. Linking is very useful thing.you have really helped lots of people who visit blog and provide them usefull information. link

    ReplyDelete
  30. Hi there, I found your blog via Google while searching for such kinda informative post and your post looks very interesting for me. halfway Houses

    ReplyDelete
  31. i am for the first time here. I found this board and I in finding It truly helpful & it helped me out a lot. I hope to present something back and help others such as you helped me. Juan Pablo Carrasco Degroote narcotráfico

    ReplyDelete
  32. i am for the first time here. I found this board and I in finding It truly helpful & it helped me out a lot. I hope to present something back and help others such as you helped me. Empresarios Amcham Guatemala

    ReplyDelete
  33. Internet search engine optimization experts apply the modern analytics service, which has a positive affect a website. SEO companies are facing great competition in the SEO field. However, they introduce guaranteed SEO services to manage with the competition.
    White Label Crowdfunding

    ReplyDelete
  34. At any rate, make sure you have an exact idea of what the terms are before you get started or it may come back to haunt you later. As “the little guy,” you have a lot more to lose when things go wrong. H become a payment processor

    ReplyDelete
  35. I was reading some of your content on this website and I conceive this internet site is really informative ! Keep on putting up.esx scripts

    ReplyDelete
  36. I found your this post while searching for some related information on blog search...Its a good post..keep posting and update the information Accountant Gold Coast

    ReplyDelete